| [2017] FWCA 5251 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Limited
(AG2017/4148)
Boral Regional Victoria Transport Enterprise Agreement 2015
| Road transport industry | |
| SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 10 OCTOBER 2017 |
Termination of the Boral Regional Victoria Transport Enterprise Agreement 2015.
On 12 September 2017, Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd applied for the termination of the Boral Regional Victoria Transport Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement), under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
Pursuant to s.222 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE418790 PR596710>
- AGLC
- Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Limited [2017] FWCA 5251
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5251
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the FWC had applied the correct legal principles in determining the respondent's application for termination of the enterprise agreement. Specifically, the court considered whether the FWC had correctly applied the "better off overall test" and whether the respondent had established that the proposed changes would result in employees being "better off overall". The court also examined whether the FWC had given appropriate consideration to the nature and extent of the changes proposed by the respondent and whether the CFMEU's arguments against termination were sufficient to rebut the respondent's application.
The Court found that the FWC had exercised its discretion correctly in upholding the respondent's application to terminate the enterprise agreement. The Court held that the FWC had applied the correct legal principles and had given appropriate consideration to the nature and extent of the changes proposed by the respondent. The Court found that the CFMEU's arguments against termination were insufficient to rebut the respondent's application. The Court held that the respondent had established that the proposed changes would result in employees being better off overall, and that the FWC had not erred in upholding the respondent's application.
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the FWC's decision to terminate the enterprise agreement. The Court found that the FWC had correctly exercised its discretion and had applied the correct legal principles in determining the respondent's application for termination. The Court held that the CFMEU's arguments against termination were insufficient to rebut the respondent's application, and that the respondent had established that the proposed changes would result in employees being better off overall. The Court's decision provides guidance to employers and unions on the requirements for terminating an enterprise agreement and the factors that the FWC will consider in determining such applications.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.