| [2017] FWCA 6134 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Boral Cement Limited T/A Boral Cement
(AG2017/5366)
BORAL CEMENT LIMITED DEPOT OPERATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT, 2017
Cement and concrete products | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 21 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Boral Cement Limited Depot Operators Enterprise Agreement, 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boral Cement Limited Depot Operators Enterprise Agreement, 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Boral Cement Limited T/A Boral Cement. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE426173 PR597923>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Boral Cement Limited T/A Boral Cement [2017] FWCA 6134
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6134
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC found that the agreement was a "single interest" enterprise agreement as it was made between an employer and employees who shared a single interest, being the operation of cement depots. The FWC also found that the agreement was made in good faith, as the employer had engaged in genuine bargaining with the employees' representative. However, the FWC identified some issues with the agreement, including the lack of provisions for shift allowances and the classification of some employees as casual workers. The FWC determined that these issues did not prevent the agreement from being approved, as the parties could negotiate and resolve these matters in the future.
The FWC approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included the requirement that the parties negotiate in good faith to address the issues identified by the FWC. The FWC also imposed a reporting requirement, whereby the parties had to report to the FWC on the progress of negotiations within six months of the approval of the agreement. The FWC emphasised that the approval of the agreement did not prevent the parties from negotiating further improvements to the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.