| [2016] FWCA 7032 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics
(AG2016/5879)
BOOM LOGISTICS LTD MORANBAH MECHANICAL PERSONNEL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 5 OCTOBER 2016 |
Application for termination of the Boom Logistics Ltd Moranbah Mechanical Personnel Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] On 21 September 2016, Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics (Boom Logistics) applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Boom Logistics Ltd Moranbah Mechanical Personnel Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] The application was accompanied by a statutory declaration in support of the termination, declared by Tony Spassopoulos, Executive General Manager of Boom Logistics.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (the CFMEU) are an employee organisation that is covered by the Agreement.
[4] On 29 September 2016, my Associate wrote to the CFMEU to seek their views in relation to the application by no later than 2:00pm on 4 October 2016.
[5] The CFMEU did not provide their views in relation to the application, despite being afforded an opportunity to do so.
The legislation
[6] Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Act provides for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date. This subdivision consists of ss. 225, 226 and 227, the terms of which are as follows:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
227 When termination comes into operation
If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”
Consideration
[7] The leading authority with respect to applications made pursuant to s.225 is a decision of a Full Bench of the Commission in Aurizon 1. In that decision the Full Bench said:
The legislative scheme therefore enables and facilitates good faith bargaining for an enterprise agreement. It also facilitates the making of enterprise agreements but does not mandate that result. Once an enterprise agreement is made and approved by the Commission, it seems clear that the legislative scheme does not intend that such agreements operate in perpetuity. Agreements have a finite nominal life. At the end of the nominal life of an agreement, bargaining parties may bargain for a new agreement utilising all of the tools available under the Act; or a person to whom an agreement applies may take steps to bring the agreement to an end in accordance with the provisions of the Act; or both may occur.
[8] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration filed with the application, in consideration of s.226(a) and having regard to the decision in Aurizon, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against the termination of the Agreement.
[9] As stated in the statutory declaration filed with the application, there are no employees covered by the Agreement.
[10] In consideration of the material before me relevant to s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[11] In accordance with s.226, I must terminate the Agreement. The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.
[12] The termination will take effect from 5 October 2016.
COMMISSIONER
1 Aurizon Operations Limited; Aurizon Network Pty Ltd; Australia Eastern Railroad Pty Ltd [2015] FWCFB 540 at [126]
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE401997 PR585971>
- AGLC
- Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics [2016] FWCA 7032
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 7032
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission evaluated the application, taking into account the substantial change in circumstances clause within the agreement. The applicant needed to demonstrate that there had been a significant shift in the economic environment or other factors that would justify the termination of the enterprise agreement. The Commission found that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate a significant change in circumstances, which was primarily due to economic factors impacting the industry. The Commission also considered the procedural fairness of the application and concluded that the applicant had adhered to the necessary requirements in making the application. Based on this analysis, the Fair Work Commission granted the application and terminated the enterprise agreement.
Consequently, the Fair Work Commission issued an order terminating the Boom Logistics Ltd Moranbah Mechanical Personnel Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016, effective from the date specified in the order. This decision provides clarity for the parties involved and sets a precedent for similar applications in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.