| [2018] FWCA 5888 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics
(AG2018/2687)
BOOM LOGISTICS LTD HUNTER VALLEY WORKSHOP ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018-2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 19 SEPTEMBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the Boom Logistics Ltd Hunter Valley Workshop Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boom Logistics Ltd Hunter Valley Workshop Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Written undertakings have been given in accordance with s.190. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 September 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 June 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500192 PR700630>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Boom Logistics Ltd T/A Boom Logistics [2018] FWCA 5888
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 5888
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement was genuinely a single-enterprise agreement and whether it met the procedural requirements under the Fair Work Act. Key issues included the representation of employees, the scope of the agreement, and whether the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion. The court considered submissions from both the applicant and the Fair Work Commission, which had made recommendations on the application.
After reviewing the submissions and evidence, the court found that the agreement was genuinely a single-enterprise agreement and that it met all procedural requirements. The court approved the agreement, noting the adequate representation of employees and the absence of any procedural flaws. The agreement was therefore registered as a single-enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.