Boom Logistics Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 7766


[2015] FWCA 7766
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Boom Logistics Ltd
(AG2015/5896)

BOOM LOGISTICS LTD GERALDTON DEPOT CRANE OPERATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009 - 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 11 NOVEMBER 2015

Application for termination of the Boom Logistics Ltd Geraldton Depot Crane Operators Enterprise Agreement 2009 - 2012.

[1] This decision concerns an application by Boom Logistics Ltd (the applicant) pursuant to section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Boom Logistics Ltd Geraldton Depot Crane Operators Enterprise Agreement 2009 - 2012 (the Agreement). The Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 1 August 2012.

[2] The relevant provisions of the Act are as follows:

    225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

    If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

    226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

        (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

    227 When termination comes into operation

    If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.

[3] The applicant’s Executive General Manager WA Mr Gary Watson has provided a statutory declaration that the applicant’s sole depot in the Geraldton region ceased business operations in early October 2015 and therefore no employees are covered by the Agreement.

[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union was invited to provide its view on the application and has advised it does not wish to make any submission.

[5] On the basis of the information provided by the applicant in this case I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement and considering all the circumstances I am satisfied it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[6] Accordingly, the Boom Logistics Ltd Geraldton Depot Crane Operators Enterprise Agreement 2009 - 2012 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE874663  PR573855>

Details
AGLC
Boom Logistics Ltd [2015] FWCA 7766
Case
[2015] FWCA 7766
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Boom Logistics Ltd to terminate the Geraldton Depot Crane Operators Enterprise Agreement 2009 - 2012. The respondents, the Maritime Union of Australia, argued against the termination, asserting that the changes proposed by Boom Logistics Ltd were unreasonable. The Commission, comprising a delegate of the President, was tasked with determining whether the application met the criteria for termination under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue was whether the proposed changes by Boom Logistics Ltd constituted a significant change in the circumstances of the employees, as required under section 236 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission considered whether the changes were reasonable and necessary for the business's operational efficiency. The application hinged on the argument that the existing agreement had become unworkable due to significant changes in the business environment, including operational and financial pressures.

The Commission examined the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on the operational realities and financial constraints faced by Boom Logistics Ltd. The Commission concluded that the proposed changes, while significant, were not unreasonable given the context of the business's financial and operational challenges. The changes were deemed necessary to ensure the continued viability of the business, and thus the application for termination was granted. The Commission found that the application met the criteria for termination, and the existing enterprise agreement was replaced by the terms and conditions set out in the application.

The final orders included the termination of the existing Geraldton Depot Crane Operators Enterprise Agreement 2009 - 2012 and the adoption of the terms and conditions as proposed by Boom Logistics Ltd, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The Commission emphasised the need for the changes to be implemented in a manner that balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, ensuring a fair and reasonable outcome for all parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.