[2013] FWCA 3882 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Boom Logistics Limited
(AG2013/1448)
BOOM LOGISTICS LTD HUNTER VALLEY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD | SYDNEY, 20 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Boom Logistics Ltd Hunter Valley Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boom Logistics Ltd Hunter Valley Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made by Boom Logistics pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 27 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2013.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE401840 PR537940>
- AGLC
- Boom Logistics Limited [2013] FWCA 3882
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3882
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue the court had to decide was whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, was free from prohibited content, and was made in good faith. The court also had to consider if the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees, particularly those who were represented by unions but not party to the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission, after thorough examination, found that the agreement did not meet certain statutory requirements. The court held that certain provisions were unfair and did not provide for the minimum entitlements as required by law. Additionally, the court determined that the agreement did not adequately protect the rights of non-party employees, thus failing to meet the good faith requirement. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission did not make any orders as the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.