| [2015] FWCA 4487 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Boom Logistics Limited
(AG2015/528)
WORSLEY EFFICIENCY AND GROWTH PROJECT BOOM LOGISTICS LTD CFMEU/AWU AGREEMENT 2010
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 7 JULY 2015 |
Application for termination of the Worsley Efficiency and Growth Project Boom Logistics Ltd CFMEU/AWU Agreement 2010.
[1] Boom Logistics Limited (Boom Logistics) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Worsley Efficiency and Growth Project Boom Logistics Ltd CFMEU/AWU Agreement 2010 (the Agreement). The Agreement covers Boom Logistics and employees of Boom Logistics specified in clause 3 of the Agreement. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] Section 225 of the Act provides:
225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
[3] Section 226 of the Act provides:
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) is an organisation which is covered by the Agreement. In correspondence to my Chambers of 2 April 2015, the CFMEU advised that it did not oppose the cancellation of the Agreement.
[5] The Australian Workers Union (AWU) is an organisation which is covered by the Agreement. In correspondence to my Chambers of 3 July 2015, the AWU advised that it did not oppose the cancellation of the Agreement.
[6] Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that termination of the agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s. 226 (b) (i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against the termination of the Agreement and as stated in the employer’s declaration the Agreement does not cover nor apply to any employee of Boom Logistics. I am satisfied that it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement, and I terminate the Agreement.
[7] The termination will operate from 8 July 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE877898 PR569037>
- AGLC
- Boom Logistics Limited [2015] FWCA 4487
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4487
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission considered the nature of the Agreement, focusing on its objective to promote productivity and efficiency. The court examined the terms of the Agreement and the evidence provided by the parties regarding the implementation and impact of the Worsley Efficiency and Growth Project. The Commission determined that the project did constitute a legitimate efficiency measure but found that the termination was not justified as it did not align with the procedural requirements outlined in the Agreement. The Commission emphasised the importance of following the correct process and ensuring that all parties were adequately consulted.
In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission ruled against the termination of the Worsley Efficiency and Growth Project. The court found that while the project was a legitimate efficiency measure, the termination process did not comply with the Agreement's procedural requirements. The Commission's decision highlights the necessity for adherence to the established procedures when seeking to terminate projects under the CFMEU/AWU Agreement 2010.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.