| [2017] FWCA 6670 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bonney Energy Pty Ltd
(AG2017/5434)
BONNEY ENERGY VICTORIAN FUEL DELIVERY DRIVERS AGREEMENT 2017
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 12 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Bonney Energy Victorian Fuel Delivery Drivers Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bonney Energy Victorian Fuel Delivery Drivers Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bonney Energy Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 12 December 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE426504 PR598653>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Bonney Energy Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 6670
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6670
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including fairness, efficiency, and flexibility benchmarks. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for appropriate minimum wages and conditions, including provisions for overtime, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement adequately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees.
In delivering its decision, the Commission found that the proposed agreement did not fully meet the fairness benchmark as required by section 235 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission identified deficiencies in the agreement's provisions regarding penalty rates and overtime, which did not align with industry standards and expectations. The Commission also noted that the agreement lacked specific provisions for dispute resolution, which was a critical oversight. As a result, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that employment agreements provide adequate protections and benefits for employees, particularly in industries where drivers face irregular working hours and potential exposure to hazardous conditions. The rejection of the agreement was intended to encourage the parties to revisit and revise the agreement to better meet the legislative requirements and protect the rights of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.