Bond and Pearcy (Costs)

Case

[2010] FamCA 1217

20 December 2010


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Bond and Pearcy (Costs) [2010] FamCA 1217 [2010] FamCA 1217 20 December 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for costs between the parties, identified as the father and the mother, following earlier proceedings before Ryan J. The specific nature of the underlying dispute that led to the costs application is not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the court was tasked with determining the quantum and terms of payment for costs awarded.

The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate sum of costs to be paid by one party to the other, and to establish the conditions under which those costs would be discharged. This involved considering any existing costs orders between the parties and setting a timeframe for payment of the outstanding balance.

Ryan J ordered that the father pay the mother's costs in the sum of $8,000. This amount was to be reduced by any costs previously ordered to be paid by the mother to the father by Collier J on 2 October 2009. The remaining balance of costs payable by the father was to be paid within 18 months. All outstanding costs applications were dismissed, and provisions were made for further submissions should either party seek costs related to the mother's application for costs.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
SPENCER & SPEIGHT [2014] FamCA 436

Cases Citing This Decision

1

SPENCER & SPEIGHT [2014] FamCA 436
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Penfold v Penfold [1980] HCA 4
Penfold v Penfold [1980] HCA 4