Bolinger v Ivy
Case
•
[2008] FamCA 274
•23 April 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bolinger v Ivy [2008] FamCA 274
[2008] FamCA 274
23 April 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Bolinger v Ivy*, the husband and wife were parties to proceedings concerning parenting orders. The court was required to determine the costs associated with their respective applications for these orders.
The central legal issue before the court was the allocation of costs incurred by the parties in relation to their parenting applications, specifically from 22 August 2007 onwards, including the costs of written submissions on the issue of costs.
The court ordered that the husband pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the parenting applications. These costs were to be on a party/party basis and were to be agreed upon by the parties within 45 days of the order. If agreement could not be reached, the costs were to be assessed in accordance with the *Family Law Rules 2004*.
The central legal issue before the court was the allocation of costs incurred by the parties in relation to their parenting applications, specifically from 22 August 2007 onwards, including the costs of written submissions on the issue of costs.
The court ordered that the husband pay the wife's costs of and incidental to the parenting applications. These costs were to be on a party/party basis and were to be agreed upon by the parties within 45 days of the order. If agreement could not be reached, the costs were to be assessed in accordance with the *Family Law Rules 2004*.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bolinger v Ivy [2008] FamCA 274
Most Recent Citation
Booysen & Ferreira [2022] FedCFamC2F 1248
Cases Citing This Decision
4
HUBER & OVESEN (No.4)
[2019] FCCA 3394
Chong and Ha (No.2)
[2018] FCCA 320
Thanh and Anor and Grimshaw
[2015] FCCA 612
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Razzi (No 2)
[1991] FCA 267