BODILLY & HAND AND ANOR
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 230
•17 April 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
BODILLY & HAND AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 230
[2018] FamCA 230
17 April 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this proceeding were Bodilly & Hand (the first applicant) and an unnamed second applicant, and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application by the wife for the release of three letters from Dr U. The matter came before Cronin J.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application for the release of the three letters from Dr U should be granted.
Cronin J dismissed the wife's application for the release of the three letters. No specific reasoning is provided in the excerpt, but the decision indicates a refusal to order the disclosure of these documents. The court otherwise adjourned all outstanding applications to a future date.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application for the release of the three letters from Dr U should be granted.
Cronin J dismissed the wife's application for the release of the three letters. No specific reasoning is provided in the excerpt, but the decision indicates a refusal to order the disclosure of these documents. The court otherwise adjourned all outstanding applications to a future date.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
BODILLY & HAND AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 230
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
2
Blair v Curran
[1939] HCA 23
Hudson Timber and Hardware Ltd v Chaudhary Group Pty Ltd
[2002] FCA 832
Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (No 2)
[1989] FCA 248