Bob White Australia Pty Ltd Trading AS Bob White Electrix

Case [2025] FWCA 2962


[2025] FWCA 2962

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bob White Australia Pty Ltd Trading AS Bob White Electrix

(AG2025/2591)

BOB WHITE ELECTRIX ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER CLARKE

MELBOURNE, 2 SEPTEMBER 2025

Application for approval of the Bob White Electrix Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Bob White Electrix Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s. 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Bob White Australia Pty Ltd (employer).

  1. Prior to approving the agreement, it was necessary to make some further enquiries of the employer and the two employee bargaining representatives relating to following matters:

(a)   The Agreement did not include a term requiring consultation with employees in respect of changes to their regular roster or ordinary hours of work, as is required by sections 201 and 205 of the Act. This was brought to the parties’ attention not as an approval requirement per se, but to alert to them the circumstance that, were the Agreement to be approved, the model consultation clause would apply.

(b)   The parties were invited to make submissions on whether section 56 or the Act and/or clause 3.2(c) adequately deal with the provision in clause 35.1(c)(ii) of the Agreement for public holiday substitution by majority. The parties were also given the opportunity to provide an undertaking in respect of this issue, and provided with a reference to the decision of the Full Bench in [2019] FWCFB 5145 for background.

(c)   The parties were invited to make submissions on whether section 56 or the Act and/or clause 3.2(c) of the Agreement adequately deal with the apparent exclusion of apprentices in clause 12.1(e)(ii) from the entitlement to severance pay. The parties were also given the opportunity to provide an undertaking in respect of this issue, and referred to section 123(d) of the Act.

(d)   The parties were informed of the decision of the Full Bench in [2018] FWCFB 139, which dealt with modern award provisions upon which clause 16 of the Agreement (dealing with abandonment of employment) was evidently based. The parties were alerted to a concern about the potential exclusion of section 117 of the Act and provided with an opportunity to make submissions and/or provide an undertaking to address this matter.

(e)   The parties’ assistance was sought in ascertaining how apprentices were to be classified and paid under the Agreement, in order that a better off overall assessment could be performed.

  1. In correspondence with chambers, the following resolutions were reached in respect of these issues:

(a)   The parties understood that model consultation term would be taken to be a term of the Agreement and wished to proceed with the Application.

(b)   An undertaking was offered by the employer to address the concern relating to public holiday substitution by majority agreement. The employee bargaining representatives were similarly supportive of the NES rights prevailing in respect of this matter.

(c)   An undertaking was offered to address the concern relating to the exclusion of apprentices from the entitlement to severance pay. The employee bargaining representatives were also supportive of the NES rights prevailing in respect of this matter.

(d)   An undertaking was offered to address the concern relating to the potential exclusion of section 117 of the Act in the abandonment of employment clause. The employee bargaining representatives were again supportive of the NES rights prevailing in respect of this matter.

(e)   It was clarified by the employer, and agreed by the employee bargaining representatives, that there were no apprentices employed by the company and further than none would be. An undertaking was offered to this effect. This addresses the concern regarding their proper classification under the agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above and having taken into account the materials provided with the application for approval and since, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187, 188 and 190 as relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertaking is taken to be at term of the Agreement, and is provided at Annexure A of this decision. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to section 205(2), the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 September 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2027.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530305  PR791347>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Bob White Australia Pty Ltd Trading AS Bob White Electrix [2025] FWCA 2962
Case
[2025] FWCA 2962
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bob White Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Bob White Electrix, applied for the approval of the Bob White Electrix Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The agreement in question was entered into between the employer and the Australian Electrical Trade Union, acting on behalf of certain employees. The dispute centred on whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue for the Commission to decide was whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment in a fair and reasonable manner, whether it complied with the minimum terms and conditions set out in the Fair Work Act, and whether it included any unlawful provisions.

The Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, providing for the terms and conditions of employment in a manner that was just and equitable. The agreement complied with the minimum terms and conditions required by the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement did not include any unlawful provisions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it covered.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Bob White Electrix Enterprise Agreement 2025, effective from the date of the decision. The approval of the agreement means that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement will apply to the employees covered by it. This decision ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable, providing clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.