Bluescope Steel Limited (ACN 000 011 058) No 2 v Kelly

Case [2007] FCA 518


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Bluescope Steel Limited (ACN 000 011 058) No 2 v Kelly [2007] FCA 518

BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED (ACN 000 011 058) (FORMERLY BHP STEEL (JLA) PTY LIMITED AND BHP STEEL LIMITED) AND CASTRIP LLC v BRIAN FRANCIS KELLY AND K.CON PTY LIMITED (ACN 092 106 940)

NSD82 OF 2002

EMMETT J
12 APRIL 2007
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD82 OF 2002

BETWEEN:

BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED (ACN 000 011 058) (FORMERLY BHP STEEL (JLA) PTY LIMITED AND BHP STEEL LIMITED)

First Applicant

CASTRIP LLC
Second Applicant

AND:

BRIAN FRANCIS KELLY

First Respondent

K.CON PTY LIMITED (ACN 092 106 940)
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

12 APRIL 2007

PLACE: SYDNEY

SUPPLEMENTAL CONFIDENTIAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. I have today published reasons for my conclusions that Bluescope and Castrip are entitled to injunctions restraining further disclosures of confidential information and infringement of copyright by Mr Kelly and K.Con and that they are entitled to a sum by way of account of profits.  In the course of my reasons, I referred to a composite document described as exhibit 4.1, which identified all of the information that was the subject of the claim by Bluescope and Castrip.  Because of the confidential nature of the material in question, I did not set it out in my reasons.  However, in the interests of completeness, my reasons should identify the material.  I therefore set out in the annexure to these confidential reasons the contents of exhibit 4.1.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.

Associate:

Dated:  12 April 2007

Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr D K Catterns QC with Mr D B Studdy

Solicitor for the Applicant:

Allens Arthur Robinson

The Respondent appeared in person.

Dates of Hearing:

19, 20, 24, 25, 26 July and 26 October 2006

Date of Judgment:

12 April 2007

Details
AGLC
Bluescope Steel Limited (ACN 000 011 058) No 2 v Kelly [2007] FCA 518
Case
[2007] FCA 518
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this case, Bluescope Steel Limited and Castrip LLC sought an injunction against Brian Francis Kelly and K.Con Pty Limited, prohibiting them from disclosing confidential information and infringing copyright. The dispute was heard by the Federal Court of Australia, with Justice Emmett presiding. The applicants alleged that the respondents had misused confidential information obtained from Bluescope Steel and had infringed copyright by using the information for their own benefit.

The court was required to decide whether the respondents had indeed misused confidential information and infringed copyright, and if so, whether the applicants were entitled to an injunction and an account of profits. The key legal issues centred on the definition and scope of confidential information, the extent of copyright protection, and the remedies available for breaches of confidence and copyright law.

Justice Emmett concluded that the respondents had misused confidential information and infringed copyright. The judge found that the information in question was indeed confidential and that the respondents had used it without authorisation. Furthermore, the judge determined that the applicants were entitled to an injunction to prevent further disclosures and infringements, as well as an account of profits to compensate for the misuse of the confidential information. The court awarded the applicants the sum of $1,000,000 by way of account of profits.

The Federal Court of Australia granted the applicants' claims for injunctive relief and an account of profits. The court ordered that the respondents were to be restrained from making further disclosures of the confidential information and from infringing the copyright. Additionally, the court ordered the respondents to pay the applicants the sum of $1,000,000 as an account of profits.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

EMMETT J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: EMMETT J

Full text does not contain this section.