Blu Lion Pty Ltd t/as Australiana Charters

Case [2015] FWCA 5404


[2015] FWCA 5404
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Blu Lion Pty Ltd t/as Australiana Charters
(AG2015/4080)

AUSTRALIANA CHARTERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT

Marine tourism and charter vessels

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 10 AUGUST 2015

Application for approval of the Australiana Charters Enterprise Agreement.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Blu Lion Pty Ltd t/as Australiana Charters (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Australiana Charters Enterprise Agreement (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement is to cover 2 employees who are employed on the applicant’s marine charter vessel, based in Yeppoon, Queensland.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 5 June 2015 and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 11 July 2015. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a vote for the Agreement’s approval, both of the employees agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 23 July 2015, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Ms H Kynoch, Manager, did not identify any instrument as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’), though I am satisfied that the Marine Tourism and Charter Vessels Award 2010 [MA000093] is the appropriate comparative instrument. Ms Kynoch said thatdaily rates of pay are rounded up to the nearest dollar and that there are no less beneficial terms. Rates of pay are to be adjusted in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decisions. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 1.7 and 6.4 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 6.4 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 4 August 2015, Mr D Tuxworth of Livingstones Employment Relationship Advisors,appeared with Ms H Kynoch for the applicant. Mr Tuxworth outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. Ms Kynoch explained that an additional benefit set out under the Agreement was the qualified right for employees to take home fish they catch on charter trips.

[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Australiana Charters Enterprise Agreement.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 11 August 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 10 August 2019.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE415140  PR570557>

Details
AGLC
Blu Lion Pty Ltd t/as Australiana Charters [2015] FWCA 5404
Case
[2015] FWCA 5404
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Blu Lion Pty Ltd, trading as Australiana Charters, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of an Enterprise Agreement. The dispute involved the terms of employment for crew members on charter vessels operated by the company. The Fair Work Commission was the court in this matter.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including compliance with the provisions regarding minimum entitlements, and whether it was fairly negotiated. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for adequate rest periods, maximum weekly hours, and other employment conditions as stipulated by the Act. Furthermore, it had to be satisfied that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and not imposed unilaterally.

The Fair Work Commission examined the provisions of the proposed agreement and the evidence of negotiation. It considered whether the agreement met the statutory minimum standards and if it was a genuine bargain between the parties. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that aligned with the legislative requirements, including provisions for rest periods and maximum weekly hours. It also found that the agreement was the product of genuine negotiations between the employer and the relevant employee representatives. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, finding it to be compliant with the Act and fairly negotiated.

The final order was that the Australiana Charters Enterprise Agreement be approved, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The approval ensured that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement would govern the employment of crew members on charter vessels operated by Blu Lion Pty Ltd.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.