[2013] FWCA 3839 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Blowflex Mouldings Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1413)
BLOWFLEX MOULDINGS PTY LTD (TASMANIA) - NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 17 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Blowflex Mouldings Pty Ltd (Tasmania) - National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Blowflex Mouldings Pty Ltd (Tasmania) - National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Blowflex Mouldings Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 24 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE401808 PR537889>
- AGLC
- Blowflex Mouldings Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3839
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3839
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred around whether the provisions of the agreement were consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the protection of employees' rights and interests. The company argued that certain provisions were not fair and reasonable, and that they did not comply with the process requirements of the Act. The union, on the other hand, maintained that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it had been negotiated in good faith.
The court found that the agreement was consistent with the principles of the Act, and that it was fair and reasonable. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it provided for the protection of employees' rights and interests. The court also found that the process requirements of the Act had been followed, and that the agreement was therefore valid and binding. The court approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure that it complied with the Act.
The final orders of the court were that the enterprise agreement be approved, subject to the modifications made by the court. The court also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission and that it be brought into effect on a specified date. The court's decision was binding on both parties and could not be appealed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.