BLEVINS & BLEVINS

In BLEVINS & BLEVINS, the applicant sought leave to institute spousal maintenance proceedings. The court was required to determine whether such leave was necessary pursuant to section 44(3) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).

The court reasoned that section 44(3) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) does not require leave to institute spousal maintenance proceedings. The court's determination was based on its interpretation of the relevant legislative provisions.

The application for leave was dismissed, and the parties were directed to attend a Conciliation Conference. Further orders were made regarding the exchange of documents, the filing of affidavits and case outlines, and the payment of court fees. The costs of the applicant were reserved.