Blaze v Grady
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 1064
•30 November 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Blaze v Grady [2015] FamCA 1064
[2015] FamCA 1064
30 November 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned orders made by Kent J regarding the parental responsibility and living arrangements for a child, B, born in 2013. The proceedings involved the Mother, the Father, and the Applicants, who were also parties to the orders. The dispute centred on the practical arrangements for the child's time with each parent, including a phased transition period and specific provisions for holidays, birthdays, and communication.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of shared parental responsibility and the detailed schedule for the child to live with and spend time with the Mother and the Father. This included establishing a transitional period for the child to move to live with the Mother, outlining specific arrangements for time with the Father during this transition, and setting out the post-transition living and contact arrangements. The court also addressed specific issues such as communication between parents, passport applications, overseas travel, and the registration of the child's name and surname.
Kent J made orders establishing equal shared parental responsibility for the child. The orders detailed a phased transition period for the child to commence living with the Mother, with specific arrangements for time with the Applicants and the Father during this transition. Following the transition period, the child was to live with the Mother, with defined periods of time spent with the Father and the Applicants, including provisions for school holidays and special occasions. The orders also included specific directions regarding communication between the parents, passport applications, overseas travel, and the registration of the child's name and surname, including a change of surname.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of shared parental responsibility and the detailed schedule for the child to live with and spend time with the Mother and the Father. This included establishing a transitional period for the child to move to live with the Mother, outlining specific arrangements for time with the Father during this transition, and setting out the post-transition living and contact arrangements. The court also addressed specific issues such as communication between parents, passport applications, overseas travel, and the registration of the child's name and surname.
Kent J made orders establishing equal shared parental responsibility for the child. The orders detailed a phased transition period for the child to commence living with the Mother, with specific arrangements for time with the Applicants and the Father during this transition. Following the transition period, the child was to live with the Mother, with defined periods of time spent with the Father and the Applicants, including provisions for school holidays and special occasions. The orders also included specific directions regarding communication between the parents, passport applications, overseas travel, and the registration of the child's name and surname, including a change of surname.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Blaze v Grady [2015] FamCA 1064
Most Recent Citation
Morton & Beatty [2022] FedCFamC2F 784
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Telford and Telford (No 3)
[2020] FamCA 755
Papp & Myers
[2020] FamCA 127
VALLANS & VALLANS
[2021] FCCA 1001
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
3
Sayer v Radcliffe
[2012] FamCAFC 209
MRR v GR
[2010] HCA 4
Potts & Bims
[2007] FamCA 394