BLAXLAND & VINCENT

In the matter of *Blaxland & Vincent*, heard before Jordan J, the court was presented with a dispute between the parties concerning proposed orders. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the fact that it led to the making of orders, is not detailed in the provided text.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination and formalisation of orders, as evidenced by the court's decision to make orders in accordance with presented minutes. Furthermore, the court was required to consider the statutory requirements for including specific particulars within these orders, namely those mandated by sections 65DA(2) and 62B of an unspecified Act.

Jordan J reasoned that the proposed orders, as presented in the minutes, were appropriate for adoption. The court applied sections 65DA(2) and 62B by ensuring that the orders clearly set out the obligations created, the potential consequences of contravention, and information regarding assistance for parties to comply. This approach ensures that the orders are both effective and informative for the parties involved.

The court ordered that the proposed orders be made, sealed, and attached to the judgment. These orders were to include a Fact Sheet detailing the particulars of obligations, consequences of contravention, and sources of assistance, as required by the relevant legislative provisions.