Blakely & Morrell (No.2)

The case of Blakely & Morrell (No.2) involved a dispute between the mother and the father of a child, concerning custody and parenting orders. The case was heard in the Family Court of Australia. The father appealed against orders made by Judge Myers on 10 September 2014, which had set aside previous orders made by the same judge on 13 June 2013. The mother had applied for a stay of certain orders, which was granted by Judge Myers on 22 August 2014. The father sought to appeal against the orders made by Judge Myers on 10 September 2014, and the mother sought to adduce further evidence in support of her application.

The legal issues before the court were whether the appeal against the orders made by Judge Myers on 10 September 2014 should be allowed, and whether the application for a stay of certain orders should be granted. The court also needed to determine whether the mother's application to adduce further evidence should be allowed. The court had to consider the relevant legal principles and authorities, as well as the evidence and submissions of the parties.

The court found that the appeal against the orders made by Judge Myers on 10 September 2014 should be allowed, and the orders should be set aside. The court also found that the application for a stay of certain orders should be granted, and the stay should continue until the determination of Appeal No 118 of 2014. The court found that, failing agreement between the parties, the orders made by Judge Myers on 13 June 2013 should continue in operation pending the determination of the appeal. The court also found that the mother's application to adduce further evidence should be granted, as it was necessary in the interests of justice. The court ordered that the father pay the mother's costs of and incidental to the appeal.

These orders reflect the court's consideration of the relevant legal principles and authorities, as well as the evidence and submissions of the parties. The court's decision was based on a careful analysis of the facts and law, and provides guidance for future cases involving similar issues.