Blaine and Rodelgo (No.2)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1672
•20 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Blaine and Rodelgo (No.2) [2017] FCCA 1672
[2017] FCCA 1672
20 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders made by Judge Jarrett in relation to the children, [X] and [Y]. The dispute involved the mother and father regarding the children's long-term care, welfare, and living arrangements.
The court was required to determine the extent of parental responsibility for the children, the specific arrangements for the children's residence and time spent with each parent, and the conditions under which the father could have contact with the children. Additionally, the court needed to address communication protocols between the parents, restrictions on the father's contact with the mother and children, and the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Judge Jarrett ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children, with specific requirements for her to consult the father via email on significant decisions concerning their long-term care, welfare, schooling, and medical treatment, providing him with at least twenty-eight days' notice. The children were to live with the mother, and the father was to spend time with them under supervised contact arrangements at designated contact centres, with costs shared equally. The father was also enjoined from directly or indirectly contacting the mother or approaching her or the children, and from being within a specified distance of their residences, school, or activities, except as provided for in the orders. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged.
The court was required to determine the extent of parental responsibility for the children, the specific arrangements for the children's residence and time spent with each parent, and the conditions under which the father could have contact with the children. Additionally, the court needed to address communication protocols between the parents, restrictions on the father's contact with the mother and children, and the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Judge Jarrett ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children, with specific requirements for her to consult the father via email on significant decisions concerning their long-term care, welfare, schooling, and medical treatment, providing him with at least twenty-eight days' notice. The children were to live with the mother, and the father was to spend time with them under supervised contact arrangements at designated contact centres, with costs shared equally. The father was also enjoined from directly or indirectly contacting the mother or approaching her or the children, and from being within a specified distance of their residences, school, or activities, except as provided for in the orders. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0