Blackwell and Trantor

Case

[2014] FCCA 1667

30 July 2014


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Blackwell and Trantor [2014] FCCA 1667 [2014] FCCA 1667 30 July 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Blackwell and Trantor*, heard by Judge Scarlett, the dispute concerned the division of property between the parties. The orders indicate a financial settlement was to be made by the Respondent Wife to the Applicant Husband, alongside the allocation of specific assets, including real property and motor vehicles, and the indemnification of each party against existing debts.

The court was required to determine the final property settlement between the parties, including the quantum of a monetary payment from the Respondent Wife to the Applicant Husband, the sole entitlement to a specific parcel of real property, and the ownership of two motor vehicles. Furthermore, the court needed to address the allocation of all other property held in the parties' sole names and the respective responsibilities for existing debts.

The court ordered the Respondent Wife to pay the Applicant Husband a sum of $113,908.00 within three months, noting a previous payment of $45,000.00. The Respondent Wife was declared solely entitled to the real property at Property A, and also to a Mazda motor car, which the Applicant Husband was to transfer. The Applicant Husband was declared solely entitled to a Mercedes Benz motor car, subject to indemnifying the Respondent Wife against any associated debt. Both parties were to be solely entitled to all other property in their names and to indemnify each other against debts standing in their respective names. In the event of non-payment of the $113,908.00, the Respondent Wife was to sell Property A, with proceeds to be applied first to sale costs, then to discharge any mortgage, rates, and finally to pay the outstanding amount to the Applicant Husband with interest, with any balance to the Respondent Wife. The Registrar was appointed to execute documents if either party failed to do so.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Equity & Trusts

Legal Concepts

  • Remedies

  • Costs

  • Consent

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

2

Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Hickey & Hickey [2003] FamCA 395
Polito and Polito [2009] FMCAfam 511