Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Blackmore Design Group Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1524 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 November 2016 Date of orders: 08 November 2016 Decision date: 08 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Blackmore Design Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Tony Sattler, Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Adam Seton, Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/00207439 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Appeal is upheld.
The section 96(1A) application known as “DA81/2013 – Section 96 Modification - Part 3” lodged with Respondent on 21 March 2016 to modify Development Consent No. DA81/2013 (as modified by “DA81/2013 – Section 96 – Part 2” on 19 March 2015) is determined by approving the modification to Condition ANS04, as set out in Annexure A.
As a consequence of order 2(b), Development Consent No. DA81/2013 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure B.
…………….
Jenny Smithson
Commissioner
207439.16 - Annexure A (14.3 KB, pdf)
207439.16 - Annexure B (171 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Blackmore Design Group Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1524
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1524
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the council had acted within its statutory powers in refusing the permit, and if the council's decision was supported by proper consideration of the relevant environmental and planning laws. Blackmore Design Group argued that the council's refusal was not justified and was instead influenced by factors outside the statutory framework.
The court meticulously reviewed the council's decision-making process, examining whether it had properly considered all relevant statutory criteria and whether it had acted in a manner that was consistent with the objectives of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. The court found that the council had failed to adequately consider the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development, and that the refusal of the permit was not supported by the evidence. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration in line with the court's findings. The final orders included a direction for the council to review the permit application with a focus on the environmental impacts and in accordance with the statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.