[2013] FWCA 3320 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Bitumax Pty Ltd T/A Boral Asphalt
(AG2013/1234)
BORAL SA ASPHALT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Asphalt industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 29 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Boral SA Asphalt Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boral SA Asphalt Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bitumax Pty Ltd T/A Boral Asphalt. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401442 PR537254>
- AGLC
- Bitumax Pty Ltd T/A Boral Asphalt [2013] FWCA 3320
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Court was required to decide included whether the agreement was made in good faith, if it provided for the proper protection of employees' interests, and whether it adhered to the procedural fairness standards as mandated by the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Court had to assess if the agreement was free from any invalid provisions that could undermine its overall fairness and effectiveness.
In rendering its decision, the Court examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. It considered the bargaining power of the parties, the transparency of the negotiations, and the extent to which the agreement addressed the employees' interests. The Court found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The provisions were deemed to adequately protect the employees' interests and were in compliance with the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Court approved the application, finding that the agreement met the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act.
The final orders of the Court were to approve the Boral SA Asphalt Enterprise Agreement 2012, recognising it as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. This decision ensured that the terms and conditions of employment would be governed by the agreed provisions, providing a stable and fair framework for both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.