| [2015] FWCA 5627 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
BIS Industries Limited
(AG2015/4239)
BIS INDUSTRIES GROOTE EYLANDT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Northern Territory | |
COMMISSIONER MCKENNA | SYDNEY, 18 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for termination of the BIS Industries Groote Eylandt Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 5 August 2015, BIS Industries Limited lodged an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) to terminate the BIS Industries Groote Eylandt Enterprise Agreement 2012 (“the Agreement”).
[2] Having considered and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination is effective on and from 18 August 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE898845 PR570857>
- AGLC
- BIS Industries Limited [2015] FWCA 5627
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5627
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the criteria for determining whether an enterprise agreement was no longer appropriate, including whether there had been a significant change in the circumstances of the business or the workforce. The court noted that the company had experienced financial difficulties and a reduction in its workforce, which were significant changes. The court also considered the impact of the agreement on the workforce and the company's ability to operate effectively. The court found that the agreement was no longer appropriate due to the changed circumstances and granted the company's application to terminate the agreement.
The court's decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case, and it did not set a broad legal precedent. However, it provides guidance on the factors that the court will consider when deciding whether an enterprise agreement is no longer appropriate. The court emphasised the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the business and the workforce when making this decision. The union's opposition to the application was unsuccessful, and the agreement was terminated as of a specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.