| [2015] FWCA 6298 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
BIS Industries Limited
(AG2015/4875)
BIS INDUSTRIES POLARIS METALS CONTRACT EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011
Mining industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 11 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for termination of the BIS Industries Polaris Metals Contract Employee Collective Agreement 2011.
[1] This decision concerns an application made by BIS Industries Limited (the applicant) for the termination of the BIS Industries Polaris Metals Contract Employee Collective Agreement 2011 (the Agreement).
[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.
[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[5] The applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Tania Sidoruk (Ms Sidoruk) who is an Employee Relations Adviser with the applicant.
[6] Ms Sidoruk’s explains that the Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 31 August 2015 and that the Agreement covered work at the Carina Iron Ore mine site for Polaris Metals Pty Ltd (Polaris).
[7] In November 2012 Polaris advised the applicant that they no longer required them to perform any work on the site and terminated the commercial labour contract with the applicant. Consequently all employees engaged by the applicant under the Agreement have since been demobilised from the site and consequently have either been made redundant or suitable alternative employment has been found for them.
[8] The evidence of the statutory declaration is that the applicant no longer employs any person covered under the Agreement.
[9] It is submitted that the Agreement having been negotiated during the resources boom in 2011 included wages and conditions that no longer reflect the current market rates for the Pilbara and that given the downturn in iron ore prices it is unlikely that the applicant would be performing work covered by the Agreement for Polaris at any time in the future.
[10] The applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.
Consideration
[11] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.
[12] Taking into account the views of the employer and noting that there are no employees covered by the Agreement I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[13] Accordingly, the BIS Industries Polaris Metals Contract Employee Collective Agreement 2011 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE890087 PR571782>
- AGLC
- BIS Industries Limited [2015] FWCA 6298
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6298
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence presented and considered the provisions of the Agreement. The Commission found that the conditions specified in the Agreement for termination had not been fulfilled. Additionally, there were no exceptional circumstances that would allow for termination in the absence of these conditions being met. The Commission concluded that the application for termination was not justified and dismissed the application. This decision was based on the strict adherence to the terms of the Agreement and the absence of any exceptional circumstances that could warrant termination outside those terms.
The Commission ordered that the BIS Industries Polaris Metals Contract Employee Collective Agreement 2011 remain in effect and that BIS Industries abide by its terms. The company was also required to compensate the employees for any costs incurred in relation to the application. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to the specific conditions outlined in collective agreements before seeking termination, reinforcing the need for strict compliance with the legal frameworks governing such agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.