Bis Industries

Case [2013] FWCA 8288


[2013] FWCA 8288

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bis Industries
(AG2013/9498)

BIS INDUSTRIES WESTERN AREAS DRIVERS AND OPERATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Mining industry

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 23 OCTOBER 2013

Application for approval of the Bis Industries Western Areas Drivers and Operators Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bis Industries Western Areas Drivers and Operators Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bis Industries. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE404924  PR543621>

Details
AGLC
Bis Industries [2013] FWCA 8288
Case
[2013] FWCA 8288
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court was an application by Bis Industries for the approval of the Bis Industries Western Areas Drivers and Operators Enterprise Agreement 2013. The dispute centred on the procedural fairness of the application process, particularly the manner in which Bis Industries communicated with potential objectors and the adequacy of the information provided to support the application. The Federal Circuit Court was tasked with determining whether the application process was fair and if the necessary criteria for approval were met.

The court examined the procedural fairness of the application, focusing on the communication methods employed by Bis Industries and the completeness of the information provided. Key issues included whether Bis Industries had adequately notified potential objectors of the application and whether the information supplied was sufficient to allow for informed objections. The court also considered whether the application met the legal requirements for approval as set out in the relevant industrial relations legislation.

The court found that the application process was procedurally fair and that Bis Industries had made reasonable efforts to notify potential objectors. It was determined that the information provided was adequate for the purposes of the application. The court concluded that all legal criteria for approval had been met and granted the application for approval of the enterprise agreement. The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the communication methods used and the sufficiency of the information provided, which satisfied the court that the application was fair and in compliance with the relevant laws.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.