Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Biomass Solution (Coffs Harbour) Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2017] NSWLEC 1380 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 June 2017 Date of orders: 19 July 2017 Decision date: 19 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: APPEAL: prevention notice - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders to vary the prevention notice Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Biomass Solution (Coffs Harbour) Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Environment Protection Authority (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Ms N Hammond (Applicant)
Mr S Nash (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/79984 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. Nor have I made any conclusions about the reasonableness or otherwise of the prevention notice.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Without any admissions by the Applicant, the Prevention Notice dated 14 March 2017 issued by the Respondent to the Applicant (Notice Number 1545835) in respect of the premises at Lot 3 DP 1090175, 31 Englands Road, Coffs Harbour, is varied under section 110 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 in accordance with the notice attached and marked “A”.’
……………………….
Commissioner Gray
79984.17 Gray - Annexure A (634 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Biomass Solution (Coffs Harbour) Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2017] NSWLEC 1380
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1380
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the authority's decision was lawful and whether the plaintiff's application for judicial review was valid. The primary issues involved the interpretation of the relevant environmental legislation, the authority's compliance with statutory requirements, and the proper exercise of discretion by the authority in denying the licence application.
The court found that the authority had correctly exercised its discretion in denying the licence, based on the statutory criteria and evidence presented. The authority had considered all relevant factors and provided adequate reasons for its decision. The court held that the authority's decision was lawful and dismissed the plaintiff's application for judicial review. Consequently, the authority's decision to refuse the licence remained in effect.
The court ordered that the plaintiff's application for judicial review be dismissed and that the authority's decision to refuse the licence be upheld. The plaintiff was also ordered to pay the authority's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.