Bindaree Outdoor Education Services

Case [2013] FWCA 8169


[2013] FWCA 8169

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Bindaree Outdoor Education Services
(AG2013/10633)

BINDAREE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013—2017

Educational services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH

MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2013

Application for approval of the Bindaree Enterprise Agreement 2013—2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bindaree Enterprise Agreement 2013—2017 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Bindaree Outdoor Education Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 October 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE404839  PR543471>

Details
AGLC
Bindaree Outdoor Education Services [2013] FWCA 8169
Case
[2013] FWCA 8169
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bindaree Outdoor Education Services recently had an application for the approval of the Bindaree Enterprise Agreement 2013—2017 heard before the Fair Work Commission. The application was brought by Bindaree Outdoor Education Services, and the respondents included the Australian Services Union and the Outdoor Education and Recreation Association. The dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment under the proposed enterprise agreement, including wages, hours of work, leave provisions, and other employment-related matters.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it met the requirements for good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. The Commission also needed to consider the views and submissions of the parties involved, including any evidence of the bargaining process and the implications of the agreement for employees and employers.

In its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the evidence presented and the arguments of both parties. It found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and that the process of bargaining was conducted in good faith. The Commission also noted that the agreement addressed the needs of both employees and employers in a balanced manner. As a result, the Commission approved the Bindaree Enterprise Agreement 2013—2017. The decision highlighted the importance of fair and reasonable terms of employment and the need for good faith bargaining in the workplace.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.