Big Property Group Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council
Case
•
[2021] NSWLEC 1161
•31 March 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Big Property Group Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1161
[2021] NSWLEC 1161
31 March 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Big Property Group Pty Ltd sought relief from the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, challenging the Randwick City Council’s refusal to approve a development application for alterations and additions to a residential flat building. The applicant argued that the refusal was unjust and sought to appeal the Council’s decision. The legal issues before the Court were whether the applicant had standing to bring the appeal, whether the refusal to approve the development application was unlawful, and whether the appeal should be upheld.
The Court found that the applicant had standing to bring the appeal, as they had a sufficient interest in the matter. The Court further found that the Council’s refusal to approve the development application was unlawful, as it was based on incorrect information and failed to consider relevant factors. The Court held that the appeal should be upheld, and the development application should be approved, subject to certain conditions. The Court granted the applicant leave to amend the application to rely on the amended architectural drawings and the amended written request seeking to justify the contravention of the height of buildings development standard.
The Court ordered that Development Application No. 108/2020 for alterations and additions to an approved residential flat building, including the provision of affordable rental housing units, construction of an additional storey, reconfiguration of the basement, and associated works, at 190-192 Carrington Road, Randwick, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A. The Court also ordered that the exhibits, other than A – D, 1 and 3, are returned.
The Court found that the applicant had standing to bring the appeal, as they had a sufficient interest in the matter. The Court further found that the Council’s refusal to approve the development application was unlawful, as it was based on incorrect information and failed to consider relevant factors. The Court held that the appeal should be upheld, and the development application should be approved, subject to certain conditions. The Court granted the applicant leave to amend the application to rely on the amended architectural drawings and the amended written request seeking to justify the contravention of the height of buildings development standard.
The Court ordered that Development Application No. 108/2020 for alterations and additions to an approved residential flat building, including the provision of affordable rental housing units, construction of an additional storey, reconfiguration of the basement, and associated works, at 190-192 Carrington Road, Randwick, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A. The Court also ordered that the exhibits, other than A – D, 1 and 3, are returned.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Planning & Development Law
Legal Concepts
-
Development Approval
-
Zoning
-
Height Restrictions
-
Amendments to Application
-
Compliance with Conditions
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Pertama Development Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2025] NSWLEC 1036
Cases Citing This Decision
24
Keystone Property Consultants v North Sydney Council
[2025] NSWLEC 1396
Pertama Development Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council
[2025] NSWLEC 1036
General Roberts Super Pty Ltd v City of Newcastle
[2024] NSWLEC 1404
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
6
Baron Corporation Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney
[2019] NSWLEC 61
Baron Corporation Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney
[2019] NSWLEC 61
Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council
[2015] NSWLEC 90