Bidfood Wa Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Classic Meats Perth

Case [2024] FWCA 2498


[2024] FWCA 2498

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bidfood Wa Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Classic Meats Perth

(AG2024/2219)

BIDFOOD CLASSIC MEATS PERTH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 5 JULY 2024

Application for approval of the Bidfood Classic Meats Perth Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Bidfood Wa Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Classic Meats Perth (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Classic Meats Perth Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. An outdated version of the Notice of Employee Representation Rights (NERR) was provided to employees. Pursuant to s 188(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor technical errors made in relation to the requirements set out in s 174(1A) of the Act. I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s 188(5) of the Act.

  1. The Agreement was made on 30 May 2024 and the application for approval was lodged on 19 June 2024. This is six days outside of the 14-day requirement in s 185(3)(b). However, I am satisfied in all the circumstances that it is fair to extend the period for lodgment to 19 June 2024.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. There were no bargaining representatives for the Agreement. Therefore, the Commission was not required to seek the views of any person or organisations, for the purposes of satisfying s.190(4) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I note that the following clauses in the Agreement appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

(a)Clause 2.6 – Abandonment of Employment; and

(b)Clause 3.4.4 – Overpayments.

  1. However, I am satisfied that under clause 1.3.5 of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 5 July 2024 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 12 July 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2027.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE525322  PR776725>

Annexure A – Undertakings

Details
AGLC
Bidfood Wa Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Classic Meats Perth [2024] FWCA 2498
Case
[2024] FWCA 2498
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bidfood Wa Pty Ltd, trading as Bidfood Classic Meats Perth, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Bidfood Classic Meats Perth Enterprise Agreement 2024. The dispute arose as the parties could not reach an agreement on certain terms and conditions of employment for the workers covered by the proposed agreement. The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, whether it contained a dispute resolution procedure, and whether the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion. The Commission considered submissions from both parties and relevant statutory provisions. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while the respondent raised concerns about specific terms and the process of agreement formation.

The Commission found that the agreement met all statutory requirements. It provided for the minimum terms and conditions set out in the award, contained an appropriate dispute resolution procedure, and was made in good faith. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was not formed under coercion, and the process followed was fair. Therefore, the Commission approved the Bidfood Classic Meats Perth Enterprise Agreement 2024. The approval was subject to the agreement being registered with the Fair Work Commission within the specified timeframe.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.