Bidfood WA Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWCA 6436


[2021] FWCA 6436
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bidfood WA Pty Ltd
(AG2021/7406)

BIDFOOD PERTH - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 26 OCTOBER 2021

Application for approval of the Bidfood Perth - Enterprise Agreement 2021

[1] Bidfood WA Pty Ltd applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Perth - Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] An Undertaking was provided by the Employer in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertaking is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertaking is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertaking. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertaking. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the Undertaking will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[4] I observe that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 2.2.6 – Authorised Deduction by the Employer for any notice not worked;

  Clause 2.3.6 – Where an Employee is not entitled to Redundancy Benefits; and

  Clause 5.2.5(a) – Notice and evidence for Personal/Carer’s, Compassionate or Unpaid family and domestic violence leave.

[5] I note clause 1.3.5 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between a provision of the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. On this basis, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. I also note that by virtue of s. 55 of the Act, an enterprise agreement must not exclude the NES or any provisions of the NES and s. 56 provides that a term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes s. 55.

[6] I am satisfied, on the basis of information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss. l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17, I am satisfied that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.

[7] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover that organisation. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[8] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 2 November 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE513660  PR735258>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Bidfood WA Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6436
Case
[2021] FWCA 6436
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Bidfood WA Pty Ltd and its employees, with the dispute centred around the approval of the Bidfood Perth - Enterprise Agreement 2021. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission (FWC), which is Australia's workplace relations tribunal. The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement was made in good faith, the extent to which it provided for proper consultation, and if the agreement met the standards required under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Specifically, the Commission had to determine whether the agreement complied with the requirements for approval and if it covered all necessary terms and conditions of employment.

The Fair Work Commission examined the process through which the agreement was negotiated and whether it was done in good faith. It also assessed the level of consultation that occurred and if it was sufficient to ensure the agreement reflected the interests of both parties. The Commission evaluated if the agreement met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act, including whether it provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and the protection of employees' rights. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that the consultation process was adequate, thus meeting the statutory requirements for approval.

After thorough examination, the Fair Work Commission concluded that the Bidfood Perth - Enterprise Agreement 2021 was compliant with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. It was deemed to cover all necessary terms and conditions of employment, and it was approved for registration. The Commission found that the agreement provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and adequately protected the rights of the employees. The decision was made based on the evidence presented and the legal standards applicable to enterprise agreements under Australian labour law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.