[2014] FWCA 4439 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
BHP Billiton WAIO Pty Ltd T/A BHP Billiton
(AG2014/1326)
EASTERN RIDGE OPERATIONS AGREEMENT 2014
Mining industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON | SYDNEY, 3 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Eastern Ridge Operations Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Eastern Ridge Operations Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. An undertaking concerning clause 13 (Issue Resolution Procedure) has been provided by the employer and it is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached at Annexure A.
[3] Clause 15 of the Agreement (Management of Change) does not meet the requirements of ss.205(1) and 205(1A) of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2), the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model term is attached at Annexure B.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 10 July 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 July 2018.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
Annexure B
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408914 PR552726>
- AGLC
- BHP Billiton WAIO Pty Ltd T/A BHP Billiton [2014] FWCA 4439
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4439
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement met the criteria set out in the Act, focusing on the environmental impact assessments, financial security provisions, and the overall benefits to the region. It was necessary to ensure that the agreement did not compromise the environmental integrity of the area and that adequate measures were in place to manage potential adverse effects. Additionally, the court evaluated the financial robustness of the agreement, considering whether the financial guarantees provided by the applicant were sufficient to cover potential liabilities arising from the mining operations. The court also weighed the economic benefits of the project against any potential detriments to the community and the environment.
In its decision, the court concluded that the Eastern Ridge Operations Agreement 2014 met the statutory requirements and was in the public interest. The agreement contained comprehensive environmental safeguards and financial provisions that addressed the court's concerns. The court found that the economic benefits of the project, including job creation and contributions to the regional economy, outweighed the potential environmental risks, provided that the applicant adhered to the stringent conditions set out in the agreement. The court approved the agreement, subject to the conditions specified in the approval order.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.