BHCP Pty Ltd (ATF BHCP Trust) v Reliable Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 137 300 219

Case

[2020] NSWDC 414

06 August 2020


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
BHCP Pty Ltd (ATF BHCP Trust) v Reliable Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 137 300 219 [2020] NSWDC 414 [2020] NSWDC 414 06 August 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the case of BHCP Pty Ltd (ATF BHCP Trust) v Reliable Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 137 300 219 was adjudicated. The dispute involved a cross-claim regarding the provision of legal advice related to documents pertinent to a loan agreement. The cross-claimants alleged professional negligence on the part of the 3rd to 6th cross-defendants, who were the solicitors involved. The central issue was whether there was a breach of the solicitor's retainer, the nature and extent of that retainer, and if it was carried out with reasonable care and skill.

The court was tasked with determining the nature and extent of the solicitor's retainer, and whether the cross-defendants had breached this retainer. Additionally, the court needed to assess if the cross-defendants performed their obligations with the requisite level of care and skill. The court examined the objective facts and inherent probabilities surrounding the conference where the advice was provided. The court found that it was inherently unlikely that the cross-defendants neglected their obligations to the cross-claimants to the extent that the cross-claimants were effectively given no advice. The allegations were not substantiated to the Briginshaw standard.

The court rendered judgment in favour of the 3rd to 6th cross-defendants against the cross-claimants, dismissing the cross-claims. The court also provided orders concerning costs, stipulating timelines for parties to notify of their intent to be heard on the matter, and deadlines for filing and serving evidence and submissions. Should a party fail to notify the court of their intent to be heard on costs, the cross-claimants would be responsible for the costs of the 3rd to 6th cross-defendants.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Tort Law

Legal Concepts

  • Breach of Contract

  • Negligence

  • Professional Negligence

  • Limitation Periods

  • Abuse of Process

  • Res Judicata

  • Admissibility of Evidence

  • Expert Evidence

  • Compensatory Damages

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

11

Statutory Material Cited

1

Polkinghorne v Holland [1934] HCA 28
David v David [2009] NSWCA 8
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1152