[2013] FWCA 5255 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Bestbar (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Best Bar Reinforcements
(AG2013/2043)
BESTBAR (VIC) PTY LTD SOUTH AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2015
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 1 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Bestbar (Vic) Pty Ltd South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bestbar (Vic) Pty Ltd South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bestbar (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Best Bar Reinforcements. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402786 PR539644>
- AGLC
- Bestbar (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Best Bar Reinforcements [2013] FWCA 5255
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5255
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC encompassed whether the enterprise agreement was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWC had to consider if the employer had engaged in good faith bargaining and if the terms of the agreement reflected the outcomes of such bargaining. Additionally, the FWC needed to examine whether the agreement met the procedural requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act, including the obligation to provide relevant information and the opportunity for proper consultation.
The FWC found that the employer had not engaged in genuine bargaining, as evidenced by the employer's failure to provide the union with necessary information and to meaningfully consult with the union. Furthermore, the FWC determined that the employer's conduct during the negotiation process was not in compliance with the statutory requirements, as the union's requests for information and clarification were repeatedly ignored. Consequently, the FWC ruled that the agreement did not meet the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. The FWC did not approve the enterprise agreement due to the employer's failure to adhere to the principles of good faith bargaining and the procedural requirements.
No orders were made by the FWC as the enterprise agreement was not approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.