Bertran v Minister for Justice

Case

[1999] FCA 1117

17 AUGUST 1999


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Bertran v Minister for Justice [1999] FCA 1117 [1999] FCA 1117 17 AUGUST 1999

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Bertran v Minister for Justice, the applicant was arrested on a provisional arrest warrant issued under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and was subsequently remanded in custody pending the determination of extradition proceedings. The applicant sought bail, arguing that special circumstances existed that justified his release on bail. The application was heard and dismissed by a magistrate, and the applicant then appealed to the Federal Court.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to bail upon establishing special circumstances justifying bail, whether the magistrate's discretion to refuse bail could be exercised notwithstanding the existence of special circumstances, and whether the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico, the country seeking his extradition, was a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.

The court found that the magistrate was correct in refusing bail to the applicant. The court held that the existence of special circumstances was not sufficient to entitle the applicant to bail, as the magistrate had the discretion to refuse bail even in the presence of such circumstances. The court also held that the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico was not a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.

The court dismissed the applicant's appeal and ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Extradition Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Extradiction

  • Bail

  • Special Circumstances

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

20

Cases Cited

13

Statutory Material Cited

1

Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39
Houghton v Arms [2006] HCA 59