Bertran v Minister for Justice
Case
•
[1999] FCA 1117
•17 AUGUST 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bertran v Minister for Justice [1999] FCA 1117
[1999] FCA 1117
17 AUGUST 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Bertran v Minister for Justice, the applicant was arrested on a provisional arrest warrant issued under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and was subsequently remanded in custody pending the determination of extradition proceedings. The applicant sought bail, arguing that special circumstances existed that justified his release on bail. The application was heard and dismissed by a magistrate, and the applicant then appealed to the Federal Court.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to bail upon establishing special circumstances justifying bail, whether the magistrate's discretion to refuse bail could be exercised notwithstanding the existence of special circumstances, and whether the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico, the country seeking his extradition, was a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.
The court found that the magistrate was correct in refusing bail to the applicant. The court held that the existence of special circumstances was not sufficient to entitle the applicant to bail, as the magistrate had the discretion to refuse bail even in the presence of such circumstances. The court also held that the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico was not a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.
The court dismissed the applicant's appeal and ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to bail upon establishing special circumstances justifying bail, whether the magistrate's discretion to refuse bail could be exercised notwithstanding the existence of special circumstances, and whether the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico, the country seeking his extradition, was a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.
The court found that the magistrate was correct in refusing bail to the applicant. The court held that the existence of special circumstances was not sufficient to entitle the applicant to bail, as the magistrate had the discretion to refuse bail even in the presence of such circumstances. The court also held that the fact that the applicant would be entitled to bail in Mexico was not a matter the magistrate was bound to take into account in determining whether special circumstances justifying bail existed.
The court dismissed the applicant's appeal and ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Extradition Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Extradiction
-
Bail
-
Special Circumstances
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 97
Cases Citing This Decision
20
Cabal v United Mexican States
[2001] FCA 97
Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth
[2000] FCA 1546
Heslehurst v Government of New Zealand
[2000] FCA 1311
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
1
Coleman v Power
[2004] HCA 39
Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally
[1999] HCA 27
Houghton v Arms
[2006] HCA 59