| [2014] FWCA 8113 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Berri Pty Limited
(AG2014/8075)
BERRI PTY LIMITED (LEETON) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 17 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Berri Pty Limited (Leeton) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Berri Pty Limited (Leeton) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 24 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE411150 PR557776>
- AGLC
- Berri Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 8113
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8113
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to resolve included whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act, particularly whether it provided for a safety net of minimum entitlements, allowed for flexible working arrangements, and adhered to procedural requirements such as proper consultation with employee representatives. Furthermore, the court had to determine if the agreement contained terms that were contrary to public policy or that failed to meet the ‘better off overall test’ for employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement generally met the legislative requirements. It provided for a safety net of minimum entitlements and allowed for flexible working arrangements, which satisfied the statutory criteria. The Commission also noted that there was adequate consultation with employee representatives, and the agreement did not contravene public policy. Importantly, the Commission determined that the agreement was likely to be better off overall for the employees, as it included improved wages and conditions. Consequently, the application for approval was successful, and the agreement was approved under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.