Bergman and Porter
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 846
•1 August 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bergman and Porter [2007] FamCA 846
[2007] FamCA 846
1 August 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Bergman and Porter, heard before Young J, the dispute concerned applications brought by the parties. The specific nature of the dispute and the subject matter of the applications are not detailed in the provided text.
The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the hearing date for all extant applications. The court was also required to consider the transcription and dissemination of its extempore reasons for judgment and the reservation of costs for practitioners appearing on the mention date.
Young J ordered that the hearing of all extant applications would remain listed for Friday, 3 August 2007, at 10:00 a.m. The court further directed that its extempore reasons for judgment be transcribed and placed on the Court file, made available to all parties, including Mr Rockman. Finally, the costs of appearance for all practitioners on that day were reserved for determination on 3 August 2007.
The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the hearing date for all extant applications. The court was also required to consider the transcription and dissemination of its extempore reasons for judgment and the reservation of costs for practitioners appearing on the mention date.
Young J ordered that the hearing of all extant applications would remain listed for Friday, 3 August 2007, at 10:00 a.m. The court further directed that its extempore reasons for judgment be transcribed and placed on the Court file, made available to all parties, including Mr Rockman. Finally, the costs of appearance for all practitioners on that day were reserved for determination on 3 August 2007.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bergman and Porter [2007] FamCA 846
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1