Bergman and Bergman (No. 6)

In the matter of *Bergman and Bergman (No. 6)*, Young J of the Family Court of Australia considered applications made by the Case Guardian, the wife, Mr Porter, and Mr Sarinsson. The dispute concerned various interlocutory orders sought in relation to proceedings between the parties.

The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of the applications for interlocutory orders filed by the Case Guardian, Mr Porter, and Mr Sarinsson, as well as the wife's application for final orders. The court was also required to consider the question of costs associated with the interlocutory hearing.

Young J dismissed the applications made by the Case Guardian and Mr Sarinsson, and otherwise dismissed the orders sought by the wife, Mr Porter, and Mr Sarinsson in their respective responses. The wife's application for final orders was adjourned to a further listing date for mention and case management orders. The question of costs was also adjourned to the same date. The court certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of Senior Counsel and Counsel for all parties.