Bentleigh and Bentleigh
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 264
•27 April 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bentleigh and Bentleigh [2018] FamCA 264
[2018] FamCA 264
27 April 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of *Bentleigh and Bentleigh* concerned an application before Hannam J in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The dispute involved parenting orders concerning two children, B and C. The orders were made by consent in part, with further orders determined by the court.
The court was required to determine the terms of parenting orders addressing the children's counselling and therapy, the recording of conversations with the children, and the presentation of the children to services or agencies regarding complaints about the other parent. Additionally, the court considered an interim parenting application filed by the father and the need for therapeutic counselling for the parents and children.
Hannam J made orders by consent restraining the mother from permitting the children to engage in counselling or therapy without the father's consent, and restraining both parties from recording conversations with the children. Both parties were also restrained from presenting the children to any service or agency regarding complaints about the other parent, except as previously ordered. The father's interim parenting application was dismissed. The court further ordered that the parents, within 21 days, contact CC Psychology to arrange an intake appointment for therapeutic counselling for themselves and the children. The parents were directed to ensure the children's attendance at all scheduled appointments, attend themselves as requested by the therapist, and comply with the therapist's recommendations. The Independent Children’s Lawyer was directed to provide specific reports and previous judgments to the therapist.
The court was required to determine the terms of parenting orders addressing the children's counselling and therapy, the recording of conversations with the children, and the presentation of the children to services or agencies regarding complaints about the other parent. Additionally, the court considered an interim parenting application filed by the father and the need for therapeutic counselling for the parents and children.
Hannam J made orders by consent restraining the mother from permitting the children to engage in counselling or therapy without the father's consent, and restraining both parties from recording conversations with the children. Both parties were also restrained from presenting the children to any service or agency regarding complaints about the other parent, except as previously ordered. The father's interim parenting application was dismissed. The court further ordered that the parents, within 21 days, contact CC Psychology to arrange an intake appointment for therapeutic counselling for themselves and the children. The parents were directed to ensure the children's attendance at all scheduled appointments, attend themselves as requested by the therapist, and comply with the therapist's recommendations. The Independent Children’s Lawyer was directed to provide specific reports and previous judgments to the therapist.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bentleigh and Bentleigh [2018] FamCA 264
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
1
Bentleigh and Bentleigh
[2017] FamCA 294
Prewett & Mann
[2013] FamCAFC 130
Langmeil & Grange
[2013] FamCAFC 31