Bendon and Bendon (No 4)
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 1230
•7 October 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bendon and Bendon (No 4) [2015] FamCA 1230
[2015] FamCA 1230
7 October 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Bendon and Bendon (No 4)*, Johns J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the wife, filed on 15 September 2015, and a response to be filed by the husband. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the procedural steps being taken.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the timeline for the husband to file and serve his response and supporting affidavit, and to set a date for the hearing of the wife's application. The court was required to manage the progression of the case by setting clear deadlines for the parties' procedural obligations.
Johns J ordered that the husband was to make, file, and serve any Response to Application in a Case and affidavit upon which he intended to rely by 4:00 pm on 14 October 2015. Subsequently, the wife's Application in a Case, filed on 15 September 2015, was adjourned for a hearing before the court at 10:00 am on 23 October 2015.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the timeline for the husband to file and serve his response and supporting affidavit, and to set a date for the hearing of the wife's application. The court was required to manage the progression of the case by setting clear deadlines for the parties' procedural obligations.
Johns J ordered that the husband was to make, file, and serve any Response to Application in a Case and affidavit upon which he intended to rely by 4:00 pm on 14 October 2015. Subsequently, the wife's Application in a Case, filed on 15 September 2015, was adjourned for a hearing before the court at 10:00 am on 23 October 2015.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1