BENDER & BENDER
Case
•
[2012] FamCA 696
•16 August 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
BENDER & BENDER
[2012] FamCA 696
[2012] FamCA 696
16 August 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Bender & Bender*, Watts J of the Family Court of Australia considered applications made by the husband. The husband sought the disqualification of the judge and an adjournment of proceedings.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the judge should disqualify herself from hearing the matter and whether the proceedings should be adjourned. The court also had to determine the future conduct of the proceedings, including the management of expert evidence and the preparation of documents.
Watts J dismissed the husband's application for disqualification, granting leave for the oral application to be made. Similarly, leave was granted for an oral application for an adjournment, which was also dismissed. The judge reasoned that the adjournment was not appropriate as the matter was already part-heard and would require further hearings. The court then made directions regarding the exchange of a valuation report, a conference between valuers to prepare a joint statement, and the potential for concurrent evidence from the valuers if disagreements persisted. Further directions were made concerning the production of a file by a law firm and the preparation of written questions by the husband for the wife, with a focus on specific periods of contribution.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the judge should disqualify herself from hearing the matter and whether the proceedings should be adjourned. The court also had to determine the future conduct of the proceedings, including the management of expert evidence and the preparation of documents.
Watts J dismissed the husband's application for disqualification, granting leave for the oral application to be made. Similarly, leave was granted for an oral application for an adjournment, which was also dismissed. The judge reasoned that the adjournment was not appropriate as the matter was already part-heard and would require further hearings. The court then made directions regarding the exchange of a valuation report, a conference between valuers to prepare a joint statement, and the potential for concurrent evidence from the valuers if disagreements persisted. Further directions were made concerning the production of a file by a law firm and the preparation of written questions by the husband for the wife, with a focus on specific periods of contribution.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Discovery
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
BENDER & BENDER
[2012] FamCA 696
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2000] HCA 63
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2000] HCA 63