Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 5748


[2013] FWCA 5748

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2259)

BELL WIGGINS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2017

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER BLAIR

MELBOURNE, 15 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 August 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE403133  PR540262>

Details
AGLC
Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5748
Case
[2013] FWCA 5748
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Bell Wiggins Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017. The respondents, represented by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, opposed the application. The nature of the dispute centred around the fairness and compliance of the proposed agreement with relevant federal employment laws.

The central legal issue was whether the enterprise agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the respondents argued that the agreement failed to ensure that employees would receive the minimum rates of pay, penalty rates, and other entitlements as provided by applicable awards. They also contended that certain provisions of the agreement were not fairly negotiated and lacked transparency.

In determining the matter, the Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and the process by which it was negotiated. The Commission found that while there were some areas of concern regarding transparency, the overall agreement provided for fair terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also concluded that the agreement did not disadvantage employees in terms of pay and conditions compared to applicable awards. Consequently, the application for approval was upheld, and the enterprise agreement was deemed to be fair and compliant with the relevant statutory requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.