Begam (Migration)
Case
•
[2023] AATA 2751
•17 August 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Begam (Migration) [2023] AATA 2751
[2023] AATA 2751
17 August 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for an Other Family (Residence) (Class BU) visa, specifically a Subclass 838 (Aged Dependent Relative) visa. The applicant sought this visa on the basis that she was the aged dependent relative of her son, Mr Mohammad Miah, who is an Australian permanent resident. The decision under review was made by the Migration Tribunal.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the applicant met the definition of an "aged dependent relative" as defined in regulation 1.03 of the Migration Regulations 1994. This required the Tribunal to determine if the applicant was a "relative" of an Australian relative, if she had no spouse or de facto partner, if she had been dependent on the Australian relative for a substantial period and remained so dependent, and if she was of an age to be granted an aged pension.
The Tribunal found that the applicant was a "relative" of Mr Miah, her son, and had provided a birth certificate as evidence. It was also satisfied that the applicant met the criterion of not having a spouse or de facto partner, having provided a death certificate for her deceased husband. The Tribunal concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration by the Minister, with a direction that the applicant met the criterion under cl 838.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, which relates to being an aged dependent relative of an Australian relative.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the applicant met the definition of an "aged dependent relative" as defined in regulation 1.03 of the Migration Regulations 1994. This required the Tribunal to determine if the applicant was a "relative" of an Australian relative, if she had no spouse or de facto partner, if she had been dependent on the Australian relative for a substantial period and remained so dependent, and if she was of an age to be granted an aged pension.
The Tribunal found that the applicant was a "relative" of Mr Miah, her son, and had provided a birth certificate as evidence. It was also satisfied that the applicant met the criterion of not having a spouse or de facto partner, having provided a death certificate for her deceased husband. The Tribunal concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration by the Minister, with a direction that the applicant met the criterion under cl 838.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, which relates to being an aged dependent relative of an Australian relative.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Begam (Migration) [2023] AATA 2751
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Huang v MIMIA
[2007] FMCA 720
Huynh v MIMIA
[2006] FCAFC 122
Huynh v MIMIA
[2006] FCAFC 122