Beach and Beach and Anor (No. 4)

The matter of *Beach and Beach and Anor (No. 4)* came before Justice Brown of the Family Court of Australia. The proceedings involved the parties, Beach and Beach, and an intervenor, who sought orders from the court. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the intervenor had an active role and sought specific relief.

The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the applications made by the intervenor. The court was also required to consider the dismissal of all other extant applications within the proceedings and to make a determination regarding the removal of the matter from the list of matters awaiting finalisation. Furthermore, the court needed to decide whether the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel, including senior counsel, for the purposes of Rule 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*.

Justice Brown's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not fully elaborated in the provided text. However, the court's decision was made by consent in accordance with Minutes of Proposed Orders that were sealed and attached to the judgment. This indicates that the parties, including the intervenor, had reached an agreement on the terms of the orders. The court directed that these Minutes remain upon the Court file.

By consent, the court ordered that the Minutes of Proposed Orders be implemented. Consequently, all extant applications were dismissed, and the proceedings were removed from the list of matters awaiting finalisation. The court also directed that the reasons for judgment concerning the intervenor's orders be transcribed and made available to the parties. Finally, pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*, the court determined that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel, including senior counsel.