BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 2841


[2014] FWCA 2841

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd
(AG2014/5757)

BD STEELFIXING PTY LTD/CFMEU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN

ADELAIDE, 1 MAY 2014

Application for approval of the BD Steelfixing Pty Ltd/CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BD Steelfixing Pty Ltd/CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application to the actual date of lodgement.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 March 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE407916  PR550127>

Details
AGLC
BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 2841
Case
[2014] FWCA 2841
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application for the approval of the BD Steelfixing Pty Ltd/CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2014. The applicant, BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd, sought approval of the agreement from the Fair Work Commission under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred on the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed agreement between the employer and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which had jurisdiction to assess the fairness and compliance of the agreement with relevant labour laws.

The central legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement was genuinely a product of bargaining between the parties, whether it complied with the Fair Work Act's requirements, and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its aspects. Specifically, the Commission examined whether the agreement met the criteria for 'better off overall' and 'no worse off overall' tests, ensuring that the employees were not disadvantaged compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the Commission considered the procedural fairness in the negotiation process and the overall balance of the agreement in terms of benefits and obligations for both parties.

The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely a product of free and informed bargaining between the parties. It was noted that the negotiations were conducted in good faith, and the agreement was comprehensive in addressing various employment conditions. The Commission also determined that the agreement met the 'better off overall' and 'no worse off overall' tests, indicating that the employees were not disadvantaged and had reasonable terms and conditions. The procedural fairness of the negotiation process was upheld, and the overall balance of the agreement was considered fair and reasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the BD Steelfixing Pty Ltd/CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2014, recognising it as compliant with the relevant labour laws.

The final orders of the Commission were that the BD Steelfixing Pty Ltd/CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The agreement was to be registered and published as required by the Fair Work Act, ensuring that it is accessible to all relevant parties. This decision provided clarity and legal certainty for both BD Steel Fixing Pty Ltd and the CFMEU, confirming the validity of the negotiated terms and conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.