[2016] FWCA 2955
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Bayntun and Co Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/2549) |
BAYNTUN AND CO PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Agricultural industry
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 12 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Bayntun and Co Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Bayntun and Co Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was
made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bayntun and
Co Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have
been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair
Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work
Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[2016] FWCA 2955
[6] The Agreement was approved on 12 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 19 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 May 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE418883 PR580236>
[2016] FWCA 2955
Annexure A
[2016] FWCA 2955
[2016] FWCA 2955
[2016] FWCA 2955
- AGLC
- Bayntun and Co Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2955
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2955
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the agreement complied with sections 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commissioner found that the agreement met these requirements, subject to the written undertakings provided by the applicant. The court also determined that the model consultation term and the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 should be included as terms of the agreement.
The Commissioner was satisfied that the written undertakings provided by the applicant would not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the agreement and would not result in substantial changes to the agreement. The Commissioner also found that the agreement met the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009, subject to the written undertakings provided by the applicant. The agreement was approved on 12 May 2016 and will operate from 19 May 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 12 May 2020.
This case highlights the importance of providing written undertakings to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. It also demonstrates the role of the Fair Work Commission in approving enterprise agreements that meet the requirements of the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.