Bavap Pty Ltd v C and B Pty Ltd (Civil Dispute)
Case
•
[2019] ACAT 15
•31 January 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bavap Pty Ltd v C and B Pty Ltd (Civil Dispute) [2019] ACAT 15
[2019] ACAT 15
31 January 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Bavap Pty Ltd v C and B Pty Ltd was before the Fair Work Commission, where the applicant sought relief in relation to a dispute with the respondent. The applicant alleged that the respondent had breached the Fair Work Act 2009 by underpaying them, among other things. The respondent denied the allegations and counterclaimed for unpaid monies, among other things.
The central legal issues in the case were whether the applicant had been underpaid by the respondent and, if so, to what extent. The Tribunal had to consider the evidence and submissions of both parties to determine the correct amount, if any, that the respondent owed to the applicant. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to decide whether the respondent was entitled to any relief on its counterclaims.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had not been underpaid by the respondent. The evidence showed that the applicant had been paid in accordance with the terms of their contract. The Tribunal also found that the respondent was not entitled to any relief on its counterclaims. The Tribunal ordered that the applicant’s claim be dismissed and that the applicant pay the respondent $3,397 plus any amount arising from the costs of the expert report and any other amounts claimed by the respondent. The Tribunal gave both parties an opportunity to provide submissions on the costs of the expert report and any other amounts claimed by the respondent, with an option for a hearing if either party wished to be heard.
The central legal issues in the case were whether the applicant had been underpaid by the respondent and, if so, to what extent. The Tribunal had to consider the evidence and submissions of both parties to determine the correct amount, if any, that the respondent owed to the applicant. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to decide whether the respondent was entitled to any relief on its counterclaims.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had not been underpaid by the respondent. The evidence showed that the applicant had been paid in accordance with the terms of their contract. The Tribunal also found that the respondent was not entitled to any relief on its counterclaims. The Tribunal ordered that the applicant’s claim be dismissed and that the applicant pay the respondent $3,397 plus any amount arising from the costs of the expert report and any other amounts claimed by the respondent. The Tribunal gave both parties an opportunity to provide submissions on the costs of the expert report and any other amounts claimed by the respondent, with an option for a hearing if either party wished to be heard.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Discovery & Disclosure
-
Interlocutory Orders
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd
[2000] NSWCA 313
Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd
[2000] NSWCA 313