Bauskis v Wainhouse
Case
•
[2020] NSWCA 17
•20 February 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bauskis v Wainhouse [2020] NSWCA 17
[2020] NSWCA 17
20 February 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Bauskis and Wainhouse, sought an extension of time to file a summons seeking leave to appeal. The application was heard by Macfarlan and Payne JJA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of time for the applicants to file their summons seeking leave to appeal. This required the Court to consider the merits of the proposed appeal and whether there was a sufficient reason to depart from the usual time limits.
The Court determined that there was no issue of principle raised by the proposed appeal that would warrant granting an extension of time. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the application.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of time for the applicants to file their summons seeking leave to appeal. This required the Court to consider the merits of the proposed appeal and whether there was a sufficient reason to depart from the usual time limits.
The Court determined that there was no issue of principle raised by the proposed appeal that would warrant granting an extension of time. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bauskis v Wainhouse [2020] NSWCA 17
Most Recent Citation
Jay & Anor v Petrikas & Ors (No.4) [2022] NSWDC 628
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
4
Wichman v Pepper Finance Corporation Limited (No 2)
[2019] NSWCA 296
K Sheridan v Colin Biggers & Paisley
[2019] NSWSC 528
The Age Company Ltd v Liu
[2013] NSWCA 26