Baumann and Rushbrooke and Ors (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 293
•10 May 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Baumann and Rushbrooke and Ors (No 2) [2017] FamCA 293
[2017] FamCA 293
10 May 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Baumann and Rushbrooke and Ors (No 2)*, the wife sought costs against the second, third, and fourth respondents. The specific nature of the underlying dispute that led to this costs application is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the court in which the decision was made.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the second, third, and fourth respondents were entitled to an order for costs against the wife.
The court dismissed the application for costs brought by the second, third, and fourth respondents against the wife. No specific reasoning for this dismissal is provided in the excerpt.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the second, third, and fourth respondents were entitled to an order for costs against the wife.
The court dismissed the application for costs brought by the second, third, and fourth respondents against the wife. No specific reasoning for this dismissal is provided in the excerpt.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Monette & Monette (No 3) [2024] FedCFamC1F 786
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4