Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited

Case [2013] FWCA 696


[2013] FWCA 696

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited
(AG2012/13124)

BATLOW FRUIT CO-OPERATIVE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2013

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

VICE PRESIDENT LAWLER

SYDNEY, 31 JANUARY 2013

Application for approval of Batlow Fruit Co-operative Collective Agreement 2011-2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Batlow Fruit Co-operative Collective Agreement 2011-2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by the Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Subject to a concern that has been addressed by way of an undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted an undertaking from Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision.

[4] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Union (AMWU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2013.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE899632  PR533664>

Details
AGLC
Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited [2013] FWCA 696
Case
[2013] FWCA 696
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Australian Industrial Relations Commission involved an application by Batlow Fruit Co-operative Limited for the approval of a collective agreement spanning the years 2011 to 2013. The primary focus was on the terms and conditions of employment for the employees within the cooperative, particularly concerning wages, hours, and other working conditions. The case was heard in the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, which has jurisdiction over industrial relations disputes and the approval of collective agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The court was required to determine whether the terms of the proposed agreement were fair and reasonable, in line with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. This involved examining if the agreement provided for a fair and efficient system for resolving workplace disputes and ensuring the protection of employees' rights. The court also needed to assess if the agreement met the standards of procedural fairness and if it adequately provided for the needs of both the employees and the employer.

The court concluded that the Batlow Fruit Co-operative Collective Agreement 2011-2013 was fair and reasonable. The agreement was deemed to provide for an efficient system of dispute resolution and ensured the protection of employees' rights. The court found that the agreement met the standards of procedural fairness and provided adequately for the needs of both parties. The court approved the collective agreement, recognising its fairness and reasonableness under the Fair Work Act. The decision emphasised the importance of balancing the interests of both employees and employers within industrial agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.